What is in a Greatvine Insights report?

(or how do we give you recruiting superpowers)

Greatvine lifts your interviewing game in 3 ways

A one-page summary of your candidate:

An assessment of 5 key values & behaviours predicting good leadership:

Suggested follow-up questions to tailor interviews based on candidate insights:

Recruiting processes only give you part of a candidate's picture. We help you not miss out on the important bits.

Want to let your short-term impressions bias your choice?

Be informed by values & behaviours demonstrated over year?

Want to be swayed by a great story-teller (who may lie)?

Be wowed by what others say about a possibly humble candidate?

Your most impressive candidate could be your worst hire - and reversely.

Greatvine Insights helps you realise the difference.

The recruitment process is difficult for hiring managers and candidates. It takes time, it can be stressful.

We took great care in creating a service that adds value and improves the recruitment experience.

Hiring can suck up lots of hours, at a time when you need more hands on deck.

Applicants can be put-off by recruiter requests that waste their time - oh no, not another 90 min. psychometric test!

Our process is designed to require very little time from hiring managers and candidates alike.

Hiring is a complex, multi-factor decision - not something that can be decided by a test.

Asking applicants to contact former colleagues can be scary - who will we talk to?

Our process lets candidates pick which experiences are off limits, and our report helps you make your own hiring decision.

Leadership is a multi-faceted endeavour, and it can be hard to know what to focus on, and what to ask.

Applying for leadership roles can be difficult as well: how can I demonstrate something intangible in a conversation?

Our carefully crafted multiple-choice questions focus on critical leadership aspects that are hard to judge in interviews.

It can be tempting but dangerous to ask for backdoor references when hiring. Do you realise the legal implications of that?

Candidates can be tempted to influence referees, and referees can feel pressured and unable to be forthcoming with their views.

Our robust terms provide a legal framework which protect respondent anonymity, avoid defamation risks and privacy concerns.

Still unsure or unclear?

Why it works